Addressing an interrogation technique ruled improper by the U.S. Supreme Court, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit has held statements made a postal worker accused of opening mail and stealing money orders were properly suppressed. The U.S. Constitution was violated, the majority ruled, when a postal investigator questioned the suspected thief without a warning, obtained a confession, and then gave him a warning and obtained a second confession.

0 replies

Leave a Reply

Want to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *